Dr. jur.
Tilman Müller
Attorney-at-Law
Certified Intellectual Property Attorney
Dr. jur.
Tilman Müller
Attorney-at-Law
Certified Intellectual Property Attorney
Tilman Müller is specialized in patent infringement proceedings and parallel nullity proceedings. He has special expertise in complex international infringement proceedings, involving more than two parties as well as SEP and related antitrust issues. Furthermore, Tilman Müller has extensive experience in IP-related arbitration proceedings as well as in the judicial enforcement of license agreements.
Another focus of his work are contracts in intellectual property law, in particular conception and implementation of license programs as well as R&D agreements. Tilman Müller also advises several international standardization organizations on contract law issues.
Tilman Müller's clients include companies from various sectors and industries, such as consumer electronics, lighting, medical and communications technology as well as chemicals.
Handelsblatt/Best Lawyers ranks Tilman Müller as one of Germany’s best lawyers 2019 in the field of Intellectual Property Law.
He speaks German and English.
Fields of Practice
- Patent litigation
- Competition law
- Licensing contracts
- Know-how protection
CV
Studied law at the Bucerius Law School in Hamburg and at the National University of Singapore with focus on European Law, First State Examination in law taken in 2005, conferral of a Phd in law in 2008, practical training in Hamburg and Berlin, Second State Examination in law taken in 2010, admission as attorney-at-law 2010.
Joined Eisenführ Speiser in 2011, previously as an attorney at CMS Hasche Sigle in the area of IP and Life Science.
Memberships
- German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR)
- Licensing Executives Society (LES)
Publications & Presentations
Standard-essential patents and FRAND licensing in Europe
IAM Patents in Europe 2018/19
EPC-Textbook "The European Patent Application"
Eisenführ Speiser und Chizai Corporation
Erste Rezeption des EuGH-Urteiles "Huawei-ZTE" durch die Instanzgerichte
Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte, Ausgabe 02/2016, Seite 62
Patentdurchsetzung als Kartellrechtsverstoß. Die Entscheidungen der EU-Kommission in Sachen Samsung und Motorola
Patent enforcement as a violation of antitrust law: EU Commission decisions in Samsung and Motorola
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2014, doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpu189
Qimonda/Infineon – Zur Insolvenzfestigkeit von Lizenzen
OLG München, Urt. vom 25. Juli 2013 – 6 U 541/12, Mitt. 2013, Heft 12, 570 ff.
(Kein) Patentschutz für Ersatzteile?
Markenartikel 2013, Heft 11, 132
Der kartellrechtliche Zwangslizenzeinwand im Patentverletzungsverfahren – 3 Jahre nach der BGH-Entscheidung „Orange Book Standard“
GRUR 2012, Heft 7, 686
Kartellrechtlicher Zwangslizenzeinwand im Patentverletzungsverfahren, Anmerkungen zu LG Mannheim
Urt. v. 09.12.2011, 7 O 122/11, Mitt. 2012, Heft 3, 125 f.
Die Sonderstellung öffentlicher Unternehmen gegenüber privaten Konkurrenten im Wettbewerbsrecht der Europäischen Gemeinschaft
Carl Heymanns Verlag, Köln u.a. 2010
Gesund oder Nicht?, Anmerkungen zur Health Claims Verordnung
Markenartikel 2010, Heft 10, 46, zusammen mit Roland Wiring